Young Tableaux, Canonical Bases, and the Gindikin-karpelevich Formula
نویسندگان
چکیده
A combinatorial description of the crystal B(∞) for finitedimensional simple Lie algebras in terms of certain Young tableaux was developed by J. Hong and H. Lee. We establish an explicit bijection between these Young tableaux and canonical bases indexed by Lusztig’s parametrization, and obtain a combinatorial rule for expressing the Gindikin-Karpelevich formula as a sum over the set of Young tableaux. 0. Introduction The Gindikin-Karpelevich formula is a p-adic integration formula proved by Langlands in [18]. He named it the Gindikin-Karpelevich formula after a similar formula originally stated by Gindikin and Karpelevich [5] in the case of real reductive groups. The formula also appears in Macdonald’s work [25] on p-adic groups and affine Hecke algebras. Let G be a split semisimple algebraic group over a p-adic field F with ring of integers oF , and suppose the residue field oF /πoF of F has size t, where π is a generator of the unique maximal ideal in oF . Choose a maximal torus T of G contained in a Borel subgroup B with unipotent radical N , and let N− be the opposite group to N . We have B = TN . The group G(F ) has a decomposition G(F ) = B(F )K, where K = G(oF ) is a maximal compact subgroup of G(F ). Fix an unramified character τ : T (F ) −→ C, and define a function f : G(F ) −→ C by f(bk) = (δτ)(b), b ∈ B(F ), k ∈ K, where δ : B(F ) −→ R>0 is the modular character of B and τ is extended to B(F ) to be trivial on N(F ). The function f is called the standard spherical vector corresponding to τ . Let G be the Langlands dual of G with the dual torus T. The set of coroots of G is identified with the set of roots of G and will be denoted by Φ. Received April 9, 2013. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 17B37; Secondary 05E10.
منابع مشابه
A combinatorial description of the affine Gindikin-Karpelevich formula of type A_{n}(1)
The classical Gindikin-Karpelevich formula appears in Langlands’ calculation of the constant terms of Eisenstein series on reductive groups and in Macdonald’s work on p-adic groups and affine Hecke algebras. The formula has been generalized in the work of Garland to the affine Kac-Moody case, and the affine case has been geometrically constructed in a recent paper of Braverman, Finkelberg, and ...
متن کاملCombinatorics of the Gindikin - Karpelevich Formula in Affine a Type
The classical Gindikin-Karpelevich formula appears in Langlands’ calculation of the constant terms of Eisenstein series on reductive groups and in Macdonald’s work on p-adic groups and affine Hecke algebras. The formula has been generalized in the work of Garland to the affine Kac-Moody case, and the affine case has been geometrically constructed in a recent paper of Braverman, Finkelberg, and ...
متن کاملRepresentation theory of p-adic groups and canonical bases
In this paper, we interpret the Gindikin–Karpelevich formula and the Casselman–Shalika formula as sums over Kashiwara–Lusztig’s canonical bases, generalizing the results of Bump and Nakasuji (2010) [7] to arbitrary split reductive groups. We also rewrite formulas for spherical vectors and zonal spherical functions in terms of canonical bases. In a subsequent paper Kim and Lee (preprint) [14], w...
متن کاملINTEGRATION ON p-ADIC GROUPS AND CRYSTAL BASES
Let G = GLr+1 over a nonarchimedean local field F . The Kashiwara crystal B(∞) is the quantized enveloping algebra of the lower triangular maximal unipotent subgroup N−. Examples are given where an integral over N−(F ) may be replaced by a sum over B(∞). Thus the Gindikin-Karpelevich formula evaluates the integral of the standard spherical vector in the induced model of a principal series repre...
متن کاملGindikin-Karpelevich finiteness for Kac-Moody groups over local fields
In this paper, we prove some finiteness results about split Kac-Moody groups over local non-archimedean fields. Our results generalize those of "An affine GindikinKarpelevich formula" by Alexander Braverman, Howard Garland, David Kazhdan and Manish Patnaik. We do not require our groups to be affine. We use the hovel I associated to this situation, which is the analogue of the Bruhat-Tits buildi...
متن کامل